RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05286
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill educational
benefits to his spouse.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He is not planning to use the benefits and would like to transfer
them to his spouse rather than waste such a valuable benefit.
The applicantÂ’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 6 Apr 89, the applicant entered active duty in the Regular Air
Force.
On 5 Apr 09, the applicant completed 20 years of active duty.
On 1 Nov 10, the applicant retired and was credited with 21 years,
6 months, and 25 days of active service.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. In Accordance With (IAW) AFI 36-
2306, Voluntary Education Programs, Attachment 9, A9. l 8. 7.1.,
members must request the TEB while on active duty. There is no
evidence in Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) or the Right Now
Technology that the applicant ever applied for or inquired about
the TEB program. The applicant provides no evidence that an
injustice occurred.
The complete AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 10 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days As of this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicantÂ’s complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2013-05286 in Executive Session on 10 Dec 14 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Nov 13.
Exhibit B. Pertinent Excerpts from Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 16 Dec 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jan 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05536
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in Title 38, U.S.C., Chapter 33 (Post-9/11 Educational Assistance), are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05445
Since the applicant served on active duty since 11 Sep 01, he was entitled to Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits in his own right and was otherwise eligible to transfer said benefits to his dependents, provided he met the prescribed active duty service commitment (ADSC) of four years. Had the applicant successfully transferred his benefits on the date requested (3 Apr 10), he would have incurred a four-year ADSC requiring him to serve until at least 2 Apr 14. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01497
As of this date, this office has not received a response. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-01497 in Executive Session on 10 Dec 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Feb 2013, w/atch. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Apr 2013.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05609
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05609 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents on 8 Feb 10, the original date of his TEB application submission. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04503
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating the applicant never applied for TEB prior to retirement. While she argues that a change to the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) somehow makes her the victim of an injustice, the burden of proof of an error or injustice rests with an applicant and we...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05141
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05141 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05457
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He made his request for Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) correctly. Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: * Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00146
DPSIT states that there is no documentation or evidence to support that the applicant initiated action to obtain the 4 year retainability required for the TEB active duty service commitment (ADSC). As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00146 in Executive Session on 4 Nov 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: ,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04584
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04584 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to show she transferred her Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits (TEB) to her dependents while on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is included at...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04592
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His active duty service commitment (ADSC) for his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) be changed to 21 Apr 11, instead of 30 Apr 15. On 20 May 13, more than two years after extending his enlistment for TEB, AFPC notified him that the TEB transfer did not occur because he did not sign the...